Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 06:06

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Week in Review: Perplexity Labs wants to do your work - TechCrunch
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
WWDC 2025: iOS 26 Rumored Features - MacRumors
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How do people in other countries view Trump's trade policies and their impact on the global economy?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
If you used Pocket to save links, these alternatives will serve you well - Android Police
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why doesn’t the UK change their flag?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.